Re: [sig-policy] FW: Prop-050 concerns from RIPE
Hash: SHA1
> i suggest that, as it we are told that it would take many months to
> implement policy-50 as ammended, that you and others propose individual
> single shot policies to address what you see as the critical issues.
>
> does this make sense as a way forward?
I support this view.
Seiichi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFJ+VDrcrhTYfxyMkIRAvPdAJ4z99DNtspRW63udRXXRw7BuGpQhQCggjq5
fKuZTm2eTDu6ejiHezoAO0Q=
=ZMdw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----