Re: [sig-policy] Prop-050-v003 and reversability/modification?
On 29/08/2008, at 7:54 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
I should also note that the proposal did not achieve consensus at the
meeting, and as far as my (possibly, or even probably flawed)
understanding of the process goes, we are, at this moment, discussing
to clarify, while it did not achieve consensus at the policy sig
at apnic 26, it was supported on the order of 2:1.
therefore, it is the chairs' understanding that this is an active
proposal under discussion and revision.
I appreciate this clarification from the Chairs. Thank you for
understanding of the process.
Yes, I'm speaking for myself again. Noone else. Really. I