On 29/08/2008, at 7:54 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
I should also note that the proposal did not achieve consensus at the meeting, and as far as my (possibly, or even probably flawed) understanding of the process goes, we are, at this moment, discussing a non-proposal.to clarify, while it did not achieve consensus at the policy sig meetingat apnic 26, it was supported on the order of 2:1. therefore, it is the chairs' understanding that this is an active proposal under discussion and revision.
I appreciate this clarification from the Chairs. Thank you for correcting my
understanding of the process. Geoff Disclaimer:Yes, I'm speaking for myself again. Noone else. Really. I promise.