Re: [sig-policy] Comments on prop-059-v001: Using the Resource Public Ke
> an AS may announce, but includes the explicit authorization of the AS
> holder.
this is not the case in operational practice. we're on the real net
now, leave your rfcs at home.
> 2 - Section 2.5.5 of the RIPE Database Update Reference Manual
> (http://www.ripe.net/db/support/update-reference-manual.pdf) is
> consistent with the RFC in requiring that route object creation
> must satisfy several authentication criteria, including that:
the radb and irrd, do not follow that.
> To be perfectly clear, yet again, to those who may otherwise
> misconstrue the context of these comments, the above is a personal
> comment, and in no way is intended to reflect any position of the
> APNIC Secretariat, now or in the future.
like most of us, perhaps you should not post from your work email address.
randy