Re: [sig-policy] prop-053-v001: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to
Randy Bush wrote:
<personal opinion not discussed with other co-chairs>
i am hesitant to have the policy sig get into the fee structure, as the
bylaws are clear that this is an EC function/responsibility. i would
hope we can find a path to discuss allocation and other policies without
getting into either the fee structure or rir operational details.
At ARIN, the way we deal with this issue is to remove any fee structure
language from the actual policy statement, and replace it with
non-binding language in an associated portion of the proposal (such as
in the rationale section) that requests that the Board consider making
changes to the fee structure. Such non-binding language sometimes gives
examples of the kinds of changes that might be suitable, but it's always
up to the Board to decide on the actual fee structure.