Re: [sig-policy] prop-053-v001: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to
> allocation of a /22 - only half that of the current /21 - then it is
> not clear to me that a new membership tier is required. If the
> current fee structure is considered prohibitive, then I would suggest
> that the fees should be reviewed first before seeking alterations to
> the membership structure.
<personal opinion not discussed with other co-chairs>
i am hesitant to have the policy sig get into the fee structure, as the
bylaws are clear that this is an EC function/responsibility. i would
hope we can find a path to discuss allocation and other policies without
getting into either the fee structure or rir operational details.