Re: [sig-policy] prop-053-v001: Changing minimum IPv4 allocation size to
As discussed in the mailing list that /24 POOL will create lot of
technical issues in routing table, in that case I have a REVISE
proposal for Creating a TINY sector membership with /22 Pool (as in
AFRINIC and ARIN minimum allocation is /22) and the APNIC Charges
should be so minimal that lot of ISP and other ITES company wishes
to have the membership of APNIC directly and this way the INCOME of
APNIC may increase as lot of new members will join APNIC.
The alteration outlined above would remove my concerns about the
viability of your proposal. If adopted, prop-053 could not only
remove a barrier for those smaller entities that seek a direct
relationship with APNIC, but could also improve the efficiency of
allocation of the remaining IPv4 space.