Re: [sig-policy] report on prop-058: Proposal to create IPv4 shared use
Randy Bush wrote (2008/02/12 14:54):
as co-chair, i was really shy to scream at this, but since you opened
the gate :)
o this is just ula-c which has been killed in the ietf and died in
every other rir
Are you implying that the proposer should go to ietf rather than rir policy
o what if i need triple nat, shall we throw away another /8?
o use ipv6!
eventually yes we should use ipv6. before we need triple nat.