IOW, I think we're in violent agreement. :-) -Scott Raul Echeberria wrote:
At 10:41 a.m. 12/02/2008, Ray Plzak wrote:Raul,The policies that have been proposed in the various regions thus far are all regional only.That's clear.None attempt to bring in the global community.That's clear.I see nothing that precludes these policies>from moving forward in their respective regions.Certainly in the discussions that take place in the individual regions, global implications have been and will be continued to be discussed. The communities should not have to wait for a global strategy in order to discuss the merits of various aspects of these proposals as they will have to be discussed in any event.I don't see your point. Who proposed to stop´de discussion?I only gave my opinion and that is that global problems need of global aproaches.Raúl _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/ppml Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin dot net if you experience any issues.
- Prev by Date: Re: [sig-policy] [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next by Date: Re: [sig-policy] report on prop-058: Proposal to create IPv4 shared use address space among LIRs
- Previous by thread: Re: [sig-policy] [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next by thread: Re: [sig-policy] [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal