Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocat
Jonny Martin wrote:
> Hi Izumi.
>> - Be an existing LIR with IPv4 allocations from an RIR/NIR AND
>> a plan for making assignments and/or sub-allocations to other
>> organizations within two years. *The LIR should also plan to
>> announce the allocation as a single aggregated block in the
>> inter-domain routing system within two years.*
> This proposal looks much better having the requirement for a plan to
> advertise any allocated IPv6 space.
> I would prefer that that the "plan" to advertise was in fact a
> "requirement" to advertise, however I'm happy either way. (And I
> hope that the 'plan to advertise' is not misconstrued in the same way
> that the 'plan for 200 assignments' in current policy seems to have
I see what you mean and tried to play with some words, but I felt
putting a word that makes it sound like a requirement gives quite a
I would prefer to leave the phrase as it is and have hosmasters to judge
on the reliability of the "plan" if you are happy either way.
I do see your point and appreciate your input!