Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocati

To: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann dot org>
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-057-v001: Proposal to change IPv6 initial allocation criteria
From: Tim Jones <tim_jones2003 at yahoo dot com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:53:36 -0800 (PST)
Cc: "sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net" <sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net>
Delivered-to: sig-policy at mailman dot apnic dot net
List-archive: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>

>More 
importantly, 
how 
many 
have 
not 
requested 
IPv6 
space 
because 
they
>misunderstood 
the 
text 
to 
mean 
that 
they 
would 
not 
qualify? 


Isn't one of the primary roles of an NIR to educate their members on interpreting policy correctly?

Cheers,
Tim.







      Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now. www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail