[sig-policy] RE: APNIC document review: APNIC Fee Schedule: Membership T

To: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
Subject: [sig-policy] RE: APNIC document review: APNIC Fee Schedule: Membership Tiers, Fees, ,and Descriptions
From: Son Tran <son at apnic dot net>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:36:14 +1000
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>, <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)


Hello Toshi

Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on the issue of
per-address fees and the implementation of the 0.94 HD ratio. The
issue will be taken to the Executive Council meeting next week for
discussion.

The Secretariat will delay implementation of the three proposals
while we await clarification on the per-address fees from the
Executive Council. At this point, we expect the new date of
implementation to be 19 March 2007.

Just to remind all Policy SIG members, the three proposals to be
 implemented are:

    prop-035: IPv6 portable assignment for multihoming
    prop-033: End site assignment policy for IPv6
    prop-031: Proposal to amend APNIC IPv6 assignment and
              utilisation requirement policy

Regards

Son

# To: Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka at nic dot ad dot jp>

# Subject: Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC Fee Schedule:

Membership Tiers, Fees, ,and Descriptions

# From: Son Tran <son at apnic dot net>
# Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:05:17 +1000
# Cc: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net

Hi Toshi

Thanks for pointing out the EC minutes regarding this proposal. We're

currently reviewing the changes needed internally and will comment

publicly to the list very soon.


Regards

Son
Toshiyuki Hosaka wrote:

    Dear Son,

    (wearing a hat of one of APNIC members)

According to the EC minutes for the endorsement of this proposal on

November 2005 (*) it says "The EC formally endorsed this proposal,

subject to its implementation not having an effect on the per-address

fee schedule."


    (*) http://www.apnic.net/ec/minutes/20051125.html#4

However this document does have an effect on the per-address fee

schedule. So I feel this document doesn't properly reflect the consensus

decision reached in the policy review process.


    I would appreciate your clarification.

    Best regards,
    Toshi
    --
    Toshiyuki Hosaka
    JPNIC

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature