Hello Toshi Apologies for the delay in getting back to you on the issue of per-address fees and the implementation of the 0.94 HD ratio. The issue will be taken to the Executive Council meeting next week for discussion. The Secretariat will delay implementation of the three proposals while we await clarification on the per-address fees from the Executive Council. At this point, we expect the new date of implementation to be 19 March 2007. Just to remind all Policy SIG members, the three proposals to be implemented are: prop-035: IPv6 portable assignment for multihoming prop-033: End site assignment policy for IPv6 prop-031: Proposal to amend APNIC IPv6 assignment and utilisation requirement policy Regards Son # To: Toshiyuki Hosaka <hosaka at nic dot ad dot jp># Subject: Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: APNIC Fee Schedule: Membership Tiers, Fees, ,and Descriptions
# From: Son Tran <son at apnic dot net> # Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:05:17 +1000 # Cc: sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net Hi ToshiThanks for pointing out the EC minutes regarding this proposal. We're currently reviewing the changes needed internally and will comment publicly to the list very soon.
Regards Son Toshiyuki Hosaka wrote: Dear Son, (wearing a hat of one of APNIC members)According to the EC minutes for the endorsement of this proposal on November 2005 (*) it says "The EC formally endorsed this proposal, subject to its implementation not having an effect on the per-address fee schedule."
(*) http://www.apnic.net/ec/minutes/20051125.html#4However this document does have an effect on the per-address fee schedule. So I feel this document doesn't properly reflect the consensus decision reached in the policy review process.
I would appreciate your clarification. Best regards, Toshi -- Toshiyuki Hosaka JPNIC
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature