Re: [sig-policy] APNIC document review: IPv6 Address Allocation and Assi
Thanks for drafting the document. The following two parts still leave
descriptions based on /48 assignments. Perpaps they should be revised too?
2.7. Utilization
Unlike IPv4, IPv6 is generally assigned to end sites in fixed amounts
(/48).
---> suggestion
remove the whole sentence for consistency with the new policy
5.1.1.c)
plan to provide IPv6 connectivity to organizations to which it
will assign /48s, ... ... ....
--> suggestion
change "it will assign /48" --> "it will make assignments"
izumi
Son Tran wrote:
> Dear SIG Members
>
>
> APNIC seeks final editorial comments on the following draft document:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> * IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This document has been updated to reflect the implementation of the
> following policy proposals:
>
>
> prop-031: Proposal to amend APNIC IPv6 assignment and utilisation
> requirement policy
>
> prop-033: End site assignment policy for IPv6
>
> prop-035: IPv6 portable assignment for multihoming
>
>
> The changes are as follows:
>
> - In section 5.1.1.1 d), the reference to a "plan for at least
> 200 /48 assignments" has been replaced by a "plan for at least
> 200 assignments".
> - The HD ratio has been changed from 0.8 to 0.94 in sections
> 5.2.2 and 7.
> - The size of assignments has been left to the LIR or ISP's
> discretion on section 5.4.1.
> - A new portable assignment criteria has been inserted as section
> 5.8.1. The section numbers for Internet Exchange Points and
> critical infrastructure have therefore been incremented.
>
>
> The document is available at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/docs/drafts/draft-ipv6-address-policy-v004.txt
>
>
> This draft is intended to implement the consensus decisions reached
> at APNIC 20 and APNIC 22 and endorsed by the Executive Council
> on 25 November 2005 and 15 December 2006. Details of the original
> proposal and links to discussions are available at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals
>
>
> Nature of the document review
> -----------------------------
> This is an editorial review only. The APNIC community has already
> reached consensus on the policy issues which are to implemented.
>
> Therefore, during the comment period, interested parties may:
>
> - object to the draft document on the grounds that it does not
> properly reflect the consensus decision reached in the Policy
> Review Process;
> - suggest improvements of any aspect of the document;
> - request that an additional call for comment be made to allow
> more consideration of substantial revisions.
>
>
> Deadline for comments
> -------------------
> Your comments are requested by 9 March 2007. Please send your
> comments to the sig-policy mailing list. Details at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/community/lists
>
>
> Regards
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Son Tran email: son at apnic dot net
> Policy Development Manager, APNIC sip: son at voip dot apnic dot net
> http://www.apnic.net phone: +61 7 3858 3100
> fax: +61 7 3858 3199
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy