Re: [sig-policy] IPv4 countdown policy proposal
At 09:25 07/02/15, David Conrad wrote:
>On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Takashi Arano wrote:
>>First of all, I believe the discussion should be done
>>based on comparison between this policy or "doing nothing special"
>>or some other counter proposal.
>
>Just to be clear, if I could summarize the proposal, the major points
>are:
>
>- do not change current allocation/assignment policy
>- reserve 10 /8s
>- when the IANA free pool gets to 30 /8s, tell the world that IPv4
>allocations end in 2 years.
>
>Is this a fair characterization?
Almost:-)
>- reserve 10 /8s
Reserved pool would be 30 - (the last 2 year's usage).
This would be definetely less than 10 /8s, probably
5-6 /8s, considering the last rush of requesting addresses.
Regards,
Takashi Arano