Re: [sig-policy] prop-045: Proposal to modify "end site"definition and a
On Jan 25, 2007, at 5:35 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
So then you're suggesting that we need also a complete review of
the "site"
definition ? Any specific suggestions ?
I think it would be less complicated to just make a proposal for
certain classes of non-ISP network to qualify for an allocation.
Changing the definition of 'end site' makes things more complicated
and is likely to have unanticipated knock-on consequences.
I'm still not entirely certain which groups of networks you want to
include. The example you gave was a university but there are a number
of universities that already have IPv6 allocations without this
policy. How are they different from the universities you are trying
to help? Is it a major difference in the way they run their networks
or is it something else?
Regards,
--
Leo Vegoda
IANA Numbers Liaison