Re: [sig-policy] prop-043: Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy d
The reason why the editorial team of IPv6 policy put "interim"
on this document was that we needed more experiences
to make it firm as the long-use IPv6 policy at that time.
In that sense, maybe it is the time we remove "interim" from
the current 5-6 year-old policy.
But if that case, we should review the whole policy conditions
one by one, which means "Revising the policy" with the deep
consideration of balancing the conditions, not just removing
the word of interim.
With this point of view, your other proposals raised up this time
need more detailed analysis to make us understand the effect of
changing conditions.
I do NOT deny your proposals. But we should be very careful when
relaxing the conditions.
regards,
Kosuke
Toshiyuki Hosaka wrote:
> Dear SIG members
>
> The proposal "Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as
> an "interim" policy document" has been sent to the Policy SIG for
> review. It will be presented at the Policy SIG at APNIC 23 in Bali,
> Indonesia, 26 February - 2 March 2007. You are invited to review and
> comment on the proposal on the mailing list before the meeting.
>
> The proposal's history can be found at:
>
> http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-043-v001.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Toshiyuki Hosaka
> on behalf of Policy SIG chair
> hosaka at nic dot ad dot jp
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> prop-043-v001: Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as
> an "interim" policy document
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Author: Jordi Palet Martinez, Consulintel
>
> Version: 1
>
> Date: 22 January 2007
>
> SIG: Policy
>
>
>
> Introduction
> ------------
> This policy modification is a minor update to the introduction section
> of the IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy.
>
>
>
> Summary of the current problem
> ------------------------------
> The policy suggest that it is an interim one, however it is not longer
> the case.
>
>
>
> Situation in other RIRs
> -----------------------
> This proposal has also been submitted to the other RIR service regions.
>
>
>
> Details
> -------
> The following policy changes are proposed for APNIC-089, "IPv6 Address
> Allocation and Assignment Policy":
>
>
> 1. Policy document's status as "interim"
>
> Section 1.1 of APNIC-089 states that the policy document is
> "interim". It is proposed that this statement be removed.
>
>
> Pros/Cons
> ---------
>
> There are no advantages or disadvantages as such, but is a clear
> question of fairness, as it is no longer true that there is a need for
> greater experience as the current text indicate.
>
>
> Effect on APNIC
> ---------------
> None.
>
>
>
> Effect on NIRs
> --------------
> None.
>
> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
>
--
***************IPv6 Internet Wonderland!******************
Kosuke Ito
Master Planning and Steering Gr., IPv6 Prom. Council of JP
New Business Office/President Office, IRI Ubiteq, Inc.
(Visiting Researcher, SFC Lab. KEIO University)
Tel:+81-3-3344-7511 Fax:+81-3-3344-7522
Cell:+81-90-9826-4220
mailto: kosuke[at]v6pc.jp http://www.v6pc.jp/
mailto: k-ito[at]ubiteq.co.jp
Lifetime e-mail: kosuke[at]stanfordalumni.org