Re: [sig-policy] APNIC 18 Proposal
| Just for interest, have organisations had the problem you describe for
| LIR-A above, or are you simply trying to pre-empt a situation which is
very
| much expected to happen in the near future? I can certainly see how it
| would give LIR-B an unintended advantage.
A bit different situation from my example, but I've heard an ISP want
to expand their address space because their service scenario changed
when they had requested initially. And there are some LIRs in JP
region that want to expand their address space if possible.
My reason for asking is that pointing out such case studies might be useful
for the presentation at the policy SIG, and for supporting the proposal you
are making. Obviously names don't need to be mentioned in public, but I
think if there is an obvious grey area in the policy (which this appears to
be), then documenting such difficulties will help clarify the necessary
parts of the existing policy.
philip
--