RE: [sig-policy]RE: [sig-ipv6]Let's restart discussion about RIPE-261 [l

To: "YongWan Ju" <ywju at nic dot or dot kr>, "Gert Doering" <gert@Space.Net>, "Ray Plzak" <plzak at arin dot net>
Subject: RE: [sig-policy]RE: [sig-ipv6]Let's restart discussion about RIPE-261 [long]
From: "Michel Py" <michel at arneill-py.sacramento dot ca dot us>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 20:38:04 -0700
Cc: <sig-policy at apnic dot net>, <sig-ipv6 at apnic dot net>, "Anne Lord" <anne at apnic dot net>
List-archive: <http://www.apnic.net/mailing-lists/sig-policy/>
List-help: <mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=help>
List-id: APNIC SIG on resource management policy <sig-policy.lists.apnic.net>
List-post: <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>,<mailto:sig-policy-request@lists.apnic.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: sig-policy-admin@lists.apnic.net
Thread-index: AcMmSHcymvkH8NgxQ627Tp4j3lUMOQAE0nng
Thread-topic: [sig-policy]RE: [sig-ipv6]Let's restart discussion about RIPE-261 [long]

>>> Gert Doering wrote:
>>> It originated on the lir-wg at ripe dot net list, as I tried to get
>>> a feel for "what the RIPE community thinks" regarding ripe-261.
>>> As such, I think it's not wrong to keep that specific part in
>>> that list.

>> Ray Plzak wrote:
>> As for the more fundamental discussions, the global v6 list is
>> the right place to go, I agree.

> Yong Wan Ju wrote:
> I agree with this opinion. As I know, that is a way of consensus
> procedure among RIRs.

I would glady listen to advice WRT how much I should repost on
global-v6. Not being one of the regulars there I certainly don't intend
to give the impression of bullying my way in.

If there is a feeling among RIRs that I am full of it please say so.

Thanks
Michel.