Re: [sig-nir] prop-054: NIR operational policy document revision
All,
- Do you support adding a reference to ip6.arpa to 'Operational
policies for National Internet Registries in the APNIC
region'?
I support this part.
- Do you support moving the technical descriptions of managing
reverse DNS zone out of 'Operational policies for National
Internet Registries in the APNIC region' and onto the APNIC
website?
Currently I cannot find the equivalent part of section 3.4 of
APNIC-103-v001 in the web page stated in the proposal:
http://www.apnic.net/services/dns_guide.html
Unless APNIC clearly describes all required procedures in the page
before Policy SIG in APNIC 25, it is difficult to support this part.
The best I could bend backward is that APNIC posts the content of the
addendum to the web page to this mailing list.
Without that, it could be blind approval for non-existent procedure.
- Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
- Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
- What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more
effective?
In the Disadvantages: part in the Pros/Cons section,
| To ensure that NIRs have enough time to adapt to the changes,
| the APNIC Secretariat will commit to a six-month notice period
| between announcing changes to the system and expected
| implementation by NIRs.
I prefer to change this to:
To ensure that NIRs have enough time to adapt to the changes,
the APNIC Secretariat will commit to at least six-month notice period
^^^^^^^^
between announcing changes to the system and expected
implementation by NIRs. The notice period can be extended upon request
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
from APNIC or an NIR.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
--
Shin Yamasaki
Japan Network Information Center (JPNIC)