Dear Paul,
It's David from TWNIC. May I have two questions regarding the
"candidate"
fee structure?
As 4.2 session in the attached file Fees-APNIC21-v1.pdf, I'm wondering
that what the definition of majority of active members of NIRs is. Will
all of IP addresses hold by the active organization be assessed as
membership tier?
The second question is why H membership tier is charged 43,520 not
46,080
in sum of NIR fee table on page 6. Could you please clarify this for me?
I'm looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks very much!
Best Regards,
David Chen
TWNIC
Paul Wilson wrote:
Dear all,
Here is a paper for discussion at the APNIC fee structure session in
Perth next week. It introduces a "candidate" fee structure - that
of, a
possible fee structure that may satisfy our collective requirements.
Please note that this is not a proposal to the meeting, it is an
informational presentation for discussion.
I look forward to seeing you all next week.
Paul.
________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC <dg at apnic dot net>
http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99
__________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
sig-nir mailing list
sig-nir at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir