[sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6p
> Okay, there is no end to this discussions.
This is wrong again.
Your subjective view is involved here again.
Some of the members still want to discuss.
You should not intervene the discussion.
(Open, transparent... you know the stuff)
> Let's confirm with the EC whether it was the wrong decision as I
> mentioned on the mailing list yesterday.
> Dear EC members on the list,
> Would you please review the decision and the process and
> provide us with
> your position on whether the consensus decision was unrighteously
> declared as some members on this mailing list believe?
This part is wrong again.
If you look at the policy development process at
this discussion can not go to EC at this point.
What do you expect from EC.
Are they gods?, judges?
You have to provide more information than above when
the discussion is over among members
> Izumi Okutani
> NIR SIG Chair
> Stephan Millet wrote:
> >>However, we have to fix the mistake first.
> > And the mistake being what ??? We don't agree with the
> KRNIC position ?
> > Stephan Millet
> > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource
> management policy *
> > _______________________________________________
> > sig-policy mailing list
> > sig-policy at lists dot apnic dot net
> > http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy