[sig-nir] RE: [sig-policy] Re: Decicion :[prop-028-v001]"AbolishingIPv6p
Izumi Okutani said the following on 24/11/05 12:30:
> As Philip has mentioned, we can still continue discussions over this
> proposal and work on it. We have to make a decision over this particular
> proposal at some point whether or not we postpone the decision, and I
> felt that more discussions are needed which was why I declared
> This however doesn't mean it is the end of the proposal - we can
> continue discussions on this topic.
I'd be delighted to. I fully understand the original motivation of the
proposal, but the proposed solution had a financial impact on APNIC. A
solution which has no financial impact on APNIC would set a better
precedent, otherwise we could end up with a situation which Randy
> Perhaps, we can set up a working group to work on this?
That's a good idea, I'd be happy to participate if you'd find that at