Phone: 1300 239 038;ÂCell +61 (0)414 753 383 ;Âskype://skeeve
facebook.com/v4nowÂ;Âlinkedin.com/in/skeeve
twitter.com/theispguyÂ; blog:Âwww.theispguy.com
We still have DN for one reason and one reason only.ARIN requires it as part of their transfer policy.We know this because the community already removed the requirement for DN for IPv4 addresses post exhaustion once, and then quickly had to put it back in because we stood to miss out on ARIN transfers.So to my mind the community has already spoken and this is what it has said:"We don't want/care about DN for post exhaustion IPv4 addresses. ÂWe've already voted to remove it once. ÂWe *DO* care about transfers from ARIN, so we put DN back. ÂThats the only reason we have DN."So here you go community... Âam I wrong with that statement?On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at v4now dot com> wrote:
Dean,I am simply asking for opinions so that when/if something happens in the other regions that the APNIC region has already discussed it, or at least had opening discussions.Do you think that we should avoid any discussion on the matter before something happens and be reactionary? or seek to open a discussion and get the feeling from the community?Lately there has been a lot of comments on involving the community more... which is what I am trying to facilitate by bringing up the topic.
...SkeeveSkeeve Stevens - Senior IP Brokerv4Now -Âan eintellego Networks Businessskeeve at v4now dot comÂ;Âwww.v4now.comPhone: 1300 239 038;ÂCell +61 (0)414 753 383 ;Âskype://skeeve
facebook.com/v4nowÂ;Âlinkedin.com/in/skeeve
twitter.com/theispguyÂ; blog:Âwww.theispguy.com
IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyersOn Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Dean Pemberton <dean at deanpemberton dot com> wrote:
Too true Bill,
For me the trigger points for any further conversation on DN are:
ARIN changes or relaxes its policy on requiring DN for transfers.
*OR*
APNIC members decide they no longer need transfers from ARIN.
I'm happy to talk about one of those things (the second), the first is
none of my business.
Dean
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch dot net> wrote:
>
> On May 18, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve at v4now dot com> wrote:
>> ARIN, RIPE and APNIC all have demonstrated need at present.
>> RIPE and ARIN are having discussions about removing or lowering the bar.
>
> Well, RIPE is. ÂI wouldnât say thatâs true of ARIN. ÂI mean, there are always people talking about stuff, but thereâs a difference between people talking and a policy proposal that has any support or chance of becoming future policy.
>
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â -Bill
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> apnic-talk mailing list
> apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
>
--
Regards,
Dean
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
--
Regards,
Dean
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk