Re: [apnic-talk] IANA Globalization Progress
And here is my comment.
1. Regarding current overlay in page 3, don't we need to mention about ASO
AC/NRO NC
which is responsible to global policy for IP/AS as part of ICANN?
(Current figure seems ICANN is handling it by themselves directly, but
it is not true)
2. While I prefer last option in page 9, do we need "NEW ENTITY 1"
responsible for gTLD policy?
I agree that it is ideally better to separate gTLD policy and gTLD
contracts,
but I don't think it is doable in this timeframe.
Rgs,
Masato Yamanishi
On 14/03/25 15:05, "Masato Yamanishi" <myamanis at japan-telecom dot com> wrote:
>Dean,
>
>While I'm very appreciated for your and InternetNZ's effort,
>can you speak it up to all community members, not only to me?
>(or to EC and/or DG in specific case)
>
>As Skeeve pointed out, I'm just a delegate from one of APNIC members in
>here.
>(BTW, I suggest you no dancing here also:-) )
>
>
>Rgs,
>Masato Yamanishi
>
>
>
>
>On 14/03/24 20:35, "Dean Pemberton" <dean at internetnz dot net dot nz> wrote:
>
>>Yamanishi-san,
>>
>>I think one of the most important things here is to get the important
>>information out to the community, encourage people to become
>>knowledgable about the issues, and contribute to them where they feel
>>appropriate.
>>
>>To that end InternetNZ group staff have prepared a short paper to help
>>inform people about the debate regarding the transition of the United
>>States Government's DNS responsibilities to the global
>>multistakeholder community.
>>
>>The paper explores the nature of what exactly is being transitioned,
>>and then analyses the actual DNS functions at the global level,
>>locates these in current institutional configurations, and then sets
>>out a few options for alternative arrangements.
>>
>>None of these are necessarily an InternetNZ preferred model. Our
>>purpose in publishing this paper is to help the discussion happen, and
>>to show there are many possible ways to organise the DNS settlement
>>after the USG exits from its current role.
>>
>>I am posting the information here in the hope that APNIC members find
>>it a useful resource with which to start providing feedback to ICANN
>>on this topic.
>>
>>https://internetnz.net.nz/system/files/pages/2014/2014-03-icann-iana-role
>>-
>>structures.pdf
>>
>>
>>Regards
>>Dean Pemberton
>>
>>Technical Policy Advisor
>>InternetNZ
>>+64 21 920 363 (mob)
>>dean at internetnz dot net dot nz
>>
>>To promote the Internet's benefits and uses, and protect its potential.
>
>