Re: [apnic-talk] Announcement: EC Election Review Panel Report
Thanks for the report.
As in the report ,it is a fact that Scrutineer objection was raised by APNIC
EC member.
Now with the report as such, I am just curious to understand whether such
objection was at all valid keeping in view coming from a fellow EC member
who also had " direct connection to the candidate".
Brajesh Jain
-----Original Message-----
From: apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net
[mailto:apnic-talk-bounces at lists dot apnic dot net] On Behalf Of Geoff Huston
Sent: 10 August 2010 13:12
To: APNIC Talk
Subject: [apnic-talk] Announcement: EC Election Review Panel Report
Dear Colleagues,
On behalf of the APNIC Executive Council, I would like to draw your
attention to the recently published report of the EC Election Review Panel.
The APNIC Executive Council commissioned an independent Election Review
Panel in June 2010 to prepare a factual report of the events of the March
2010 EC election.
The Panel's brief was to consider the following specific questions:
1. Were the election procedures followed?
2. Was the integrity of the election impaired in any manner? If
so, how?
3. To provide recommendations as to how the conduct of the EC
election process could be improved, as appropriate.
The Election Review Panel's report has been recently received by the EC.
The Panel's report is now published in the EC's section of the APNIC web
site: http://www.apnic.net/ec
Geoff Huston
Executive Secretary to the APNIC EC
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk