Re: [apnic-talk] Report on traffic directed to 1.0.0.0/8
On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
> The particular question under investigation here is the extent to which addresses in network 1.0.0.0/8 are an "attractor" for unwanted traffic. In particular, is there a significant level of "leakage" of supposedly private use traffic directed to addresses in 1.0.0.0/8 that leak into the public Internet?
Another relevant issue is the historic inclusion of 1.0.0.0/8 in bogon filters - including some instances in which such blacklisting may be a default and/or hardcoded
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor dot net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice.
-- H.L. Mencken