Fw: [apnic-talk] Re: [ga] Early Warning: CAIDA Analysis of IPv4consumpti
Please get me off that mailing list.
Thanks.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com>
To: "Danny Younger" <dannyyounger at yahoo dot com>
Cc: "Thomas Narten" <narten at us dot ibm dot com>; "JFC Morfin"
<jefsey at club-internet dot fr>; <apnic-talk at apnic dot net>; "icann board address"
<icann-board at icann dot org>; <ga at gnso dot icann dot org>
Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 4:33 PM
Subject: [apnic-talk] Re: [ga] Early Warning: CAIDA Analysis of
IPv4consumption rates
> Danny and all former DNSO GA members or other interested
stakeholders/users,
>
> Who's we, Danny? Got a mouse in your pocket or maybe a
> IANA staff member? No, I rather doubt you do. Rather
> ICANN and the IANA along with it's IP registries have been
> less than responsibly good stewards of IPv4 address space..
> Is such a surprise? No, not really...
>
>
> Danny Younger wrote:
>
> > Hi Jefsey,
> >
> > My interest is in knowing (1) what global policies are
> > in place that deal with IPv4 reclamation; (2) what
> > impact IPv4 depletion will have upon the global
> > business community, and the costs associated with
> > ramping up to IPv6; (3)is a black market for IPv4
> > address expected to emerge, and if so, can policies be
> > put into place that would serve to deter anticipated
> > price gouging and profiteering? Perhaps someone from
> > the addressing community can speak to these points.
> >
> > It comes down to this... are we being good stewards of
> > this diminishing resource?
> >
> > Danny
> >
> > --- JFC Morfin <jefsey at club-internet dot fr> wrote:
> >
> > > Danny,
> > > this kind of "prediction" is of low interest. What
> > > is of interest for
> > > us users is the date of the impact of this shortage
> > > on our ability to
> > > use the Internet as we should. This date is a long
> > > ago. It is exactly
> > > when HTTP 1.1. has been deemed necessary, with a
> > > virtual host routing
> > > on unconsistant names instead of IP addresses. That
> > > day NATs were
> > > legitimated. The Internat was borned. The Internat
> > > may very well be
> > > the future of the Internet.
> > > jfc
> > >
> > >
> > > At 17:37 06/04/2006, Danny Younger wrote:
> > >
> > > >Last October, CAIDA's K.C. Claffy predicted IPv4
> > > >depletion by 2008 at the "Future of IPv4
> > > Roundtable".
> > > >Notes and commentary (including a different set of
> > > >predictions from Cisco's Tony Hain) may be found
> > > at:
> > >
> >
>http://www.arin.net/meetings/minutes/ARIN_XVI/ppm_minutes_day1.html#anchor_
8
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >__________________________________________________
> > > >Do You Yahoo!?
> > > >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around
> > > >http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
> "Obediance of the law is the greatest freedom" -
> Abraham Lincoln
>
> "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
> very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
>
> "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
> liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
> P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
> United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
> ===============================================================
> Updated 1/26/04
> CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
> IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
> ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
> E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix dot netcom dot com
> Registered Email addr with the USPS
> Contact Number: 214-244-4827
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> apnic-talk mailing list
> apnic-talk at lists dot apnic dot net
> http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk
>
>