Re: APNIC Chair and DG Clarification
Pindar,
Yes I do hope that the new Chair will be able to clarify this in a
suitably rapid timeframe.
And many thanks for your expression of appreciation here.
kind regards,
Geoff
At 08:03 PM 3/3/98 +0800, Pindar Wong wrote:
>Geoff,
>
>Thanks very much for your prompt reply and for taking the time to clarify
>matters.
>
>In light of this information, I presume that early next week the new chair
>will arrange to put forward proposals to the membership as far as retaining
>David in some capacity (assuming of course they the new chair *also* talks
>to David ;) ).
>
>I'm sorry to hear that you are not available to continue as the Chair; but
>would just like to express my appreciation for the time you have served ...
>and continue to serve on the APNIC Exco.
>
>Looking forward to some fruitful discussion on apnic-talk at apnic dot net
>
>Cheers,
>
>p.
>
>[ PS: cc'list pruned ]
>
>At 10:48 PM 3/3/98 +1100, Geoff Huston wrote:
>>Pindar,
>>
>>Thanks for your note.
>>
>>Lets get these 2 questions answered here.
>>
>>1) We are electronically voting on officvers right now. We hope to
>>have an announcement of officers by the end of this week. I have indicated
>>to the other cxommittee members that I am not available to continuine
>>for another term in the capacity as Chair of this committee.
>>
>>2) David is Acting Director-General at present. We will of course
>>be talking with hom over a continuing role in this near future.
>>
>>I'd be happy to answer any other questions, but perhaps the cc list
>>should be trimmed down just a little to the apnic-talk list as I suspect
>>we are overstepping the mark of cross posting!
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>> Geoff Huston
>> Executive Committee Member
>>
>>At 06:06 PM 3/2/98 +0000, Pindar Wong wrote:
>>>TO: APNIC-Exco Members
>>>
>>>To follow-up on what on what Daniel and I have mentioned earlier, may I
>>>humbly ask for clarification on the following:
>>>
>>>1) Who is currently the chair of the APNIC-Exco? [ are we to assume that
>>>Geoff continues in this capacity ]
>>>2) Does David' currently have a formal role within APNIC's existing
>>>structure? [e.g. interim DG?]
>>>
>>>I ask this so that we can more fruitfully direct our discussions.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Pindar
>>>
>>>At 10:13 AM 3/2/98 +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>>>[ snip ]
>>>
>>>>I recommend to the APNIC *membership* to consider the person David
>>>>Conrad and what he has achieved on their behalf and offer him an
>>>>adaequate position within the APNIC structure. Whether this be one of
>>>>paid "technical director" or unpaid "special advisor" or some such I
>>>>cannot say. What I can say is that in my opinion you should not loose
>>>>David and that in order to keep him your explicit support needs to come
>>>>from the membership at large and be voiced clearly and individually.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Daniel Karrenberg
>>>
>>>At 11:09 PM 2/27/98 +0000, I wrote:
>>>>The question is, have we really tried to formally retain him in some form?
>>>>Retainer basis, month-to-month contract extension etc. etc.
>>>>
>>>>We could after all, explore what engineering work needs to be done and see
>>>>if David is interested as CTO or somesuch. He's should know what the
>>>>registry needs... he's done it for years.
>>>
>>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>>| To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net |
>>>+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
Mailto: gih at telstra dot net
http://www.telstra.net/gih
See you at INET'98, Geneva 21-24,July 98 http://www.isoc.org/inet98/
_________________________________________________________________________
| To unsubscribe: send "unsubscribe" to apnic-talk-request at apnic dot net |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+