I haven't heard much on here about any of the proposals that were sent back to the list
after the Busan meeting.
I think the biggest objection to Prop 99 was the nibble boundary and the resulting fee
jumps due to the quasi-linear nature of APNIC fees (a structure I suggest should be
revisited, but, that's out of scope here).
However, in the absence of a fee structure change, would Prop 99 be
more feasible if we made the nibble boundary optional so that you have the option
of getting your allocation rounded up to nibbles, but, you are not required to.
(In other words, you can justify your complete allocation to APNIC and then request
that they issue you whatever smaller block you like at the time.)
If that would resolve the issues and bring the policy to consensus, I'm happy to submit
such a change.
Owen
