Keyboard Shortcuts
Thread View
j: Next unread messagek: Previous unread messagej a: Jump to all threadsj l: Jump to MailingList overview
Dear SIG members
The proposal "Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as an "interim" policy document" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the Policy SIG at APNIC 23 in Bali, Indonesia, 26 February - 2 March 2007. You are invited to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list before the meeting.
The proposal's history can be found at:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-043-v001.html
Regards,
Toshiyuki Hosaka on behalf of Policy SIG chair hosaka@nic.ad.jp
________________________________________________________________________
prop-043-v001: Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as an "interim" policy document ________________________________________________________________________
Author: Jordi Palet Martinez, Consulintel
Version: 1
Date: 22 January 2007
SIG: Policy
Introduction ------------ This policy modification is a minor update to the introduction section of the IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy.
Summary of the current problem ------------------------------ The policy suggest that it is an interim one, however it is not longer the case.
Situation in other RIRs ----------------------- This proposal has also been submitted to the other RIR service regions.
Details ------- The following policy changes are proposed for APNIC-089, "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy":
1. Policy document's status as "interim"
Section 1.1 of APNIC-089 states that the policy document is "interim". It is proposed that this statement be removed.
Pros/Cons ---------
There are no advantages or disadvantages as such, but is a clear question of fairness, as it is no longer true that there is a need for greater experience as the current text indicate.
Effect on APNIC --------------- None.
Effect on NIRs -------------- None.
hi Jordi,
The reason why the editorial team of IPv6 policy put "interim" on this document was that we needed more experiences to make it firm as the long-use IPv6 policy at that time.
In that sense, maybe it is the time we remove "interim" from the current 5-6 year-old policy.
But if that case, we should review the whole policy conditions one by one, which means "Revising the policy" with the deep consideration of balancing the conditions, not just removing the word of interim.
With this point of view, your other proposals raised up this time need more detailed analysis to make us understand the effect of changing conditions. I do NOT deny your proposals. But we should be very careful when relaxing the conditions.
regards,
Kosuke
Toshiyuki Hosaka wrote:
Dear SIG members
The proposal "Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as an "interim" policy document" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the Policy SIG at APNIC 23 in Bali, Indonesia, 26 February - 2 March 2007. You are invited to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list before the meeting.
The proposal's history can be found at:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-043-v001.htmlRegards,
Toshiyuki Hosaka on behalf of Policy SIG chair hosaka@nic.ad.jp
prop-043-v001: Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as an "interim" policy document ________________________________________________________________________
Author: Jordi Palet Martinez, Consulintel
Version: 1
Date: 22 January 2007
SIG: Policy
Introduction
This policy modification is a minor update to the introduction section of the IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy.
Summary of the current problem
The policy suggest that it is an interim one, however it is not longer the case.
Situation in other RIRs
This proposal has also been submitted to the other RIR service regions.
Details
The following policy changes are proposed for APNIC-089, "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy":
Policy document's status as "interim"
Section 1.1 of APNIC-089 states that the policy document is "interim". It is proposed that this statement be removed.
Pros/Cons
There are no advantages or disadvantages as such, but is a clear question of fairness, as it is no longer true that there is a need for greater experience as the current text indicate.
Effect on APNIC
None.
Effect on NIRs
None.
sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
Hi Kosuke,
I perfectly understand the reason behind that text, and totally agree that it was fine at that time. However, I think is the time to remove it.
I don't really think there is a need to review the complete policy, as there have been already, in all the regions, several variations to the original "common" policy.
So my view is that this "review" has been done already in a natural and step by step way.
May be if you have concerns about any specific points in the existing policy, it will be good to openly discuss them ?
Of course, I will expect also you inputs in my other proposals !
Regards, Jordi
De: Kosuke Ito kosuke@bugest.net Responder a: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net Fecha: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:08:51 +0900 Para: sig-policy@apnic.net Asunto: Re: [sig-policy] prop-043: Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as an "interim" policy document
hi Jordi,
The reason why the editorial team of IPv6 policy put "interim" on this document was that we needed more experiences to make it firm as the long-use IPv6 policy at that time.
In that sense, maybe it is the time we remove "interim" from the current 5-6 year-old policy.
But if that case, we should review the whole policy conditions one by one, which means "Revising the policy" with the deep consideration of balancing the conditions, not just removing the word of interim.
With this point of view, your other proposals raised up this time need more detailed analysis to make us understand the effect of changing conditions. I do NOT deny your proposals. But we should be very careful when relaxing the conditions.
regards,
Kosuke
Toshiyuki Hosaka wrote:
Dear SIG members
The proposal "Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as an "interim" policy document" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review. It will be presented at the Policy SIG at APNIC 23 in Bali, Indonesia, 26 February - 2 March 2007. You are invited to review and comment on the proposal on the mailing list before the meeting.
The proposal's history can be found at:
http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-043-v001.htmlRegards,
Toshiyuki Hosaka on behalf of Policy SIG chair hosaka@nic.ad.jp
prop-043-v001: Proposal to remove reference to IPv6 policy document as an "interim" policy document ________________________________________________________________________
Author: Jordi Palet Martinez, Consulintel
Version: 1
Date: 22 January 2007
SIG: Policy
Introduction
This policy modification is a minor update to the introduction section of the IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy.
Summary of the current problem
The policy suggest that it is an interim one, however it is not longer the case.
Situation in other RIRs
This proposal has also been submitted to the other RIR service regions.
Details
The following policy changes are proposed for APNIC-089, "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy":
Policy document's status as "interim"
Section 1.1 of APNIC-089 states that the policy document is "interim". It is proposed that this statement be removed.
Pros/Cons
There are no advantages or disadvantages as such, but is a clear question of fairness, as it is no longer true that there is a need for greater experience as the current text indicate.
Effect on APNIC
None.
Effect on NIRs
None.
sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
-- ***************IPv6 Internet Wonderland!****************** Kosuke Ito Master Planning and Steering Gr., IPv6 Prom. Council of JP New Business Office/President Office, IRI Ubiteq, Inc. (Visiting Researcher, SFC Lab. KEIO University) Tel:+81-3-3344-7511 Fax:+81-3-3344-7522 Cell:+81-90-9826-4220 mailto: kosuke[at]v6pc.jp http://www.v6pc.jp/ mailto: k-ito[at]ubiteq.co.jp Lifetime e-mail: kosuke[at]stanfordalumni.org
sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
********************************************** The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org
Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 ! http://www.ipv6day.org
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.
Activity Summary
- 6093 days inactive
- 6093 days old
- sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
- 3 participants
- 2 comments