Activity Summary
- 5723 days inactive
- 5723 days old
- sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
- 2 participants
- 2 comments
j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
Leo wrote:
More
importantly, how many have not requested IPv6 space because they
misunderstood
the text to mean that they would not qualify?
Isn't one of the primary roles of an NIR to educate their members on interpreting policy correctly?
Cheers, Tim.
Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now. www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail
Isn't one of the primary roles of an NIR to educate their members on
interpreting policy correctly? Yes, and we do it for those who attend our meetings.
It is still hard to prevent misunderstandings to LIRs who are not active, especially small to medium sized ISPs outside Tokyo.
It makes things complicated to explain on websites " the policy officially defines these criteria, but you can actually apply if you meet the following conditions...". ... so we felt we might as well define the policy in a more straight forward manner to avoid unnecessary misunderstanndings.
izumi
Tim Jones wrote:
Leo wrote:
More
importantly, how many have not requested IPv6 space because they
misunderstood
the text to mean that they would not qualify?
Isn't one of the primary roles of an NIR to educate their members on interpreting policy correctly?
Cheers, Tim.
Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now. www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail
sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
One more point I forgot to mention.
I agree this proposal won't lead to promoting IPv6 deployment and this is not the intention in the first place. Its intention is to remove unintended barrier for ISPs when they have made a decision to start the deployment of IPv6.
izumi
Izumi Okutani wrote:
Isn't one of the primary roles of an NIR to educate their members on
interpreting policy correctly? Yes, and we do it for those who attend our meetings.
It is still hard to prevent misunderstandings to LIRs who are not active, especially small to medium sized ISPs outside Tokyo.
It makes things complicated to explain on websites " the policy officially defines these criteria, but you can actually apply if you meet the following conditions...". ... so we felt we might as well define the policy in a more straight forward manner to avoid unnecessary misunderstanndings.
izumi
Tim Jones wrote:
Leo wrote:
More
importantly, how many have not requested IPv6 space because they
misunderstood
the text to mean that they would not qualify?
Isn't one of the primary roles of an NIR to educate their members on interpreting policy correctly?
Cheers, Tim.
Make the switch to the world's best email. Get the new Yahoo!7 Mail now. www.yahoo7.com.au/worldsbestemail
sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy