j: Next unread message
k: Previous unread message
j a: Jump to all threads
j l: Jump to MailingList overview
Dear SIG members,
I support the intent of the proposal, "Distribution of IPv4 addresses once the final /8 period starts." But I also share the same concern of Terry (and others) that the final /8 policy only allows one /22 allocation to a full APNIC member. Putting returned addresses to the pool (may not called the fnal /8 pool if it causes confusion) is good. But could "how such returned addresses should be distributed by APNIC" be better defined other than allocating one /22 to each member.