Disclaimer: the comments below reflect the views of the proposal authors and
have NO link to co-chair's opinion about this proposal
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Critical infrastructure/IXP/Multihoming applicants may not be able to justify a /22 requirement,
currently half of the assignments made in AP region is /24, besides that, the criterias for
allocations and assignments are some how different.
We currently allow allocations and assignments, but prop-062 only allow allocations.
We are not trying to fulfil every needs, just try to be fair and consistent.
Regards
Terence
CNNIC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" randy@psg.com
To: "Izumi Okutani" izumi@nic.ad.jp
Cc: sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 9:52 PM
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-081: Eligibility for assignments fromthe final /8
< chair hat = off >
I think it could be possible that there will be needs for these
assignments if there is a new gTLD/ccTLD set up as critical
infrastructure, and we could also have new IXPs or multi-homed
networks. We constantly make 3-4 assignments/year for these use
within JP.
ixps, multi-homed networks, etc. are precisely the users expected for
prop-062. so why is the final /8 olicy not satisfactory for them all
of a sudden?
let us remember, we will be out of ipv4 space. we will simply not be
able to fulfil every need.
randy
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
