Activity Summary
- 5699 days inactive
- 5699 days old
- sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
- 2 participants
- 1 comments
j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
________________________________________________________________________
prop-052: Cooperative distribution of the end of the IPv4 free pool ________________________________________________________________________
Dear SIG members
Below is a summary of discussion on the proposal since the last summary was posted on 7 February 2008. We encourage you to discuss this proposal on the mailing list before it is presented at the Policy SIG session at APNIC 25 on Thursday 28 February 2008.
We particularly encourage those of you who have previously not taken part in the discussion to express your views:
- Do you support or oppose this proposal?
- Does this proposal solve a problem you are experiencing? If so, tell the community about your situation.
- Do you see any disadvantages in this proposal?
- Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
- What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
Discussion statistics ---------------------
Number of posts
- Since last summary: 0 - Since proposal posted (28 November 2007): 0
People participating in discussions
- Since last summary: 0 - Since proposal posted (28 November 2007): 0
Economy of origin of participants: 0
Summary of discussion since last summary ----------------------------------------
There has been no discussion on the proposal since it was formally submitted to APNIC in November.
Full details of the proposal, including a link to the previous discussion summary posted to this list, can be found at:
perhaps the coplete lack of comment on this proposal is because it is not a policy proposal at all. it is prescription for a detail of inter-rir operational procedure.
i suspect we could also prescribe that the rirs all run freebsd, which i think would be eminently sensible. :)
i suspect that we have a weak history of differentiating between policy and operational details. we may not need to continue that history.
randy