j: Next unread message
k: Previous unread message
j a: Jump to all threads
j l: Jump to MailingList overview
I think these are well worth a read in relation to the policy proposals we have in front of us for the next meeting. In particular, the following sections are very straightforward ways of expressing some of the ideas we're discussing:
5.1.1. Initial allocation criteria
To qualify for an initial allocation of IPv6 address space, an organisation must:
a) be an LIR; b) have a plan for making sub-allocations to other organisations and/or End Site assignments within two years.
5.1.2. Initial allocation size
Organisations that meet the initial allocation criteria are eligible to receive a minimum allocation of /32.
Organisations may qualify for an initial allocation greater than /32 by submitting documentation that reasonably justifies the request. If so, the allocation size will be based on the number of existing users and the extent of the organisation's infrastructure.
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [ipv6-wg] 2010-06 Proposal Accepted (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments) Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 08:49:51 +0100 From: email@example.com Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org To: email@example.com CC: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Consensus has been reached, and the proposal described in 2010-06 has been accepted by the RIPE community.
The updated policy "IPv6 Address Allocation and Assignment Policy" is available at:
The new policy "Value of the "status:" and "assignment-size:" attributes in inet6num objects for sub-assigned PA space" is available at:
You can find the full proposal at:
Thank you for your input.
Emilio Madaio Policy Development Officer RIPE NCC