Activity Summary
- 636 days inactive
- 636 days old
- sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
- 3 participants
- 2 comments
j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
Thank you Ching-Heng,
I want to confirm about prop-142. This propsal aquire to publish transfer log about all type of it. In this change, NIRs also need to publish transfer log as same as APNIC's one isn't it? (Of course, it depends on the status of each NIR's transfer policy implementation.)
If I have a misunderstanding, plz indicate it.
Regards,
Koki Nakagawa/JPNIC
On 2022/03/04 10:34, chku wrote:
Dear colleagues,
Version 1 of prop-142: Unify Transfer Policies Text, reached consensus at the APNIC 53 Open Policy Meeting and later at the APNIC General Meeting (AGM).
This proposal will now move to the next step in the APNIC Policy Development Process and is being returned to the Policy SIG mailing list for the final Comment Period.
- Deadline for comments: 23:59 (UTC +10) Sunday, 03 April 2022.
Proposal details, including the full text of the proposal, history, and links to previous versions are available at:
https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-142
Regards, Bertrand, Ching-Heng, Shaila Policy SIG Chairs
sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-policy@lists.apnic.net/ To unsubscribe send an email to sig-policy-leave@lists.apnic.net
Hi Koki, all,
Let me clarify it.
The actual policy for IPv4 transfers has this text at the end of 8.0: "APNIC will maintain a public log of all transfers made under this policy."
The rest of the transfers (actual policy), is silent about that, so even if APNIC could also include those transfers into the log, it is not "enforced" to do that.
Our proposal is taking *exactly the same* text ("APNIC will maintain a public log of all transfers.") but into the new combined section 5, which apply to all the transfers.
So, the proposal is NOT enforcing the NIRs to do that publication, they could voluntarily, but probably, having a single "centralized" web page with the publication of all the transfers is easier to maintain. To be honest, it probably depends on if already the NIRs have that web page for actual IPv4 transfers, maybe you can confirm if that's the case?
Tks!
Regards, Jordi @jordipalet
El 4/3/22 7:54, "Koki Nakagawa" k-nkgw@nic.ad.jp escribió:
Thank you Ching-Heng,
I want to confirm about prop-142. This propsal aquire to publish transfer log about all type of it. In this change, NIRs also need to publish transfer log as same as APNIC's one isn't it? (Of course, it depends on the status of each NIR's transfer policy implementation.)
If I have a misunderstanding, plz indicate it.
Regards,
Koki Nakagawa/JPNIC
On 2022/03/04 10:34, chku wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Version 1 of prop-142: Unify Transfer Policies Text, reached consensus at the APNIC 53 > Open Policy Meeting and later at the APNIC General Meeting (AGM). > > This proposal will now move to the next step in the APNIC Policy Development Process > and is being returned to the Policy SIG mailing list for the final Comment Period. > > - Deadline for comments: 23:59 (UTC +10) Sunday, 03 April 2022. > > Proposal details, including the full text of the proposal, history, and links to previous > versions are available at: > > https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/proposals/prop-142 > > Regards, > Bertrand, Ching-Heng, Shaila > Policy SIG Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy - sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <https://mailman.apnic.net/<a href=>/">https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-policy@lists.apnic.net/ > To unsubscribe send an email to sig-policy-leave@lists.apnic.net _______________________________________________ sig-policy - sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <https://mailman.apnic.net/<a href=>/">https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-policy@lists.apnic.net/ To unsubscribe send an email to sig-policy-leave@lists.apnic.net
********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.