Orbit

Dear Alastair, and David,

Thank you for your comment. The Secretariat has contacted the author of the proposal to confirm the revised wording of the consensus version of proposal. We should have the revised version posted to the list within the next day or so. In the meantime, please feel free to provide feedback on the consensus element of version two of the proposal:

It is proposed that the minimum IPv4 allocation size be changed from /21 to /22.

thanks toshi --- Toshiyuki Hosaka

Alastair Johnson wrote (2008/03/04 15:22):

David Woodgate wrote:

...

As a point of order, shouldn't the final call be made on a new version of the text that eliminates the references to fees and membership tiers, to reflect the changes made at the SIG meeting?

I don't think a final call should be made on a version of the document that is known to be different from the agreed proposal.

I agree with David. The proposal needs to be updated to reflect the outcome of the discussion last week.

aj

•          sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
  

---

sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Dear colleagues,

The APNIC Secretariat would like to clarify that if the proposal is approved at each remaining stage of the policy development process, the implementation would include an associated change in allocation criteria.

Two of the criteria for an initial allocation would be updated to show:

- An LIR must have used a /24 from their upstream provider or demonstrate an immediate need for a /24 - An LIR must demonstrate a detailed plan for use of a /23 within a year

The remaining two criteria for initial allocations and the criteria for subsequent IPv4 allocations would not be affected by this proposal.

The current initial allocation criteria are documented in Section 9.3 of APNIC-86, 'Policies for IPv4 address space management in the Asia Pacific region' at:

http://www.apnic.net/policy/add-manage-policy.html#9.3

Regards Sunny

-------------------------------------------------------------------- Srinivas Chendi email: sunny@apnic.net Policy Development Manager, APNIC sip: sunny@voip.apnic.net http://www.apnic.net phone: +61 7 3858 3189 ____________________________________________________________________

Toshiyuki Hosaka wrote:

Dear All,

An updated version of the policy proposal text that reflects the consensus decision in the APNIC 25 Policy SIG and endorsement by the APNIC Member Meeting is now available:

 http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-053-v003.html

Thanks and best regards, toshi

---

Toshiyuki Hosaka

Toshiyuki Hosaka wrote:

...

Dear Alastair, and David,

Thank you for your comment. The Secretariat has contacted the author of the proposal to confirm the revised wording of the consensus version of proposal. We should have the revised version posted to the list within the next day or so. In the meantime, please feel free to provide feedback on the consensus element of version two of the proposal:

It is proposed that the minimum IPv4 allocation size be changed
from /21 to /22.

thanks toshi

---

Toshiyuki Hosaka

Alastair Johnson wrote (2008/03/04 15:22):

...

David Woodgate wrote:

...

As a point of order, shouldn't the final call be made on a new version of the text that eliminates the references to fees and membership tiers, to reflect the changes made at the SIG meeting?

I don't think a final call should be made on a version of the document that is known to be different from the agreed proposal.

I agree with David. The proposal needs to be updated to reflect the outcome of the discussion last week.

aj

•          sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management 
  

policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

•          sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
  

---

sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy