Hi, there had been some additional comments on the JP mailing list.
It's a little more specific than my previous comment, so I'd like to
share them here.
Dear all,
APNIC secretariat was tasked with the following action from APNIC 20.
To refer further discussion of the policy proposal of applying HD
ratio to
IPv4 to the mailing list.
This email is sent on behalf of the Policy SIG chairs.
At APNIC 20, the APNIC secretariat presented findings from the LIR
survey to
help progress discussions of the policy proposal [prop-020- v001]
"Application of HD ratio to IPv4"
The survey concluded that:
-40% reported they had problems reaching 80% utilization -There is
no strong
correlation between 80% utilization problems and network size and
complexity
measured and based on
-number of POPs
-number of services deployed
-number of levels of hierarchy
The LIR survey results slides and transcripts is available at http://
www.apnic.net/meetings/20/programme/sigs/policy.html
The history and status of the prop-020-v001 can be found at http://
www.apnic.net/docs/policy/proposals/prop-020-v001.html
The question to be answered by those on this list is :
"Do you support proposal [prop-020-v001] "Application of the HD
ratio to
IPv4"
as a replacement for the current 80% measure of utilisation."
Please submit your opinions to this list, to assist us as chairs
in deciding
what to do with this proposal.
Kind regards,
Kenny Huang
Policy SIG chair
policy *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy