j: Next unread message
k: Previous unread message
j a: Jump to all threads
j l: Jump to MailingList overview
I have yet to see a reason to agree to this proposal in current form, if theare are no mechanisms to make sure that the data field
a) won't get populated by existing members b) won't get updated and validated on a regular basis.
If the (b) is part of the policy, then I am all for it.
This actually brings up the question why is there no effort to validate whois information, and as Mark Foster pointed out - those of us with .com domains seems to get that on a regular interval.. I don't see a reason it can't be the same for IP/ASN resources.
I think it would ake sense to start another proposal, that looks for a yearly update request or something similar. But Where is the sense of putting it to this proposal for abuse-c and leaving out the admin-c and tech-c.
If there is so much unity about this. Let's start this proposal as soon as possible.