Hi Owen, Mike,
Thank you for your comments.
I'm the author of prop-112.
The purpose of this policy proposal is not to align the boundary but
to utilize unused space. Up to /29 is reserved for each /32 in the
legacy space.
| From: sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net [mailto:sig-policy-bounces@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
| Sent: Wednesday, 4 February 2015 4:05 p.m.
| To: Masato Yamanishi
| Cc: sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
| Subject: Re: [sig-policy] [New Policy Proposal ] prop-112: On demand expansion of IPv6 address allocation size in legacy IPv6 space
|
| I will again oppose this as written. I would much rather see policy deliver nibble-boundary based allocations.
|
| I would rather see such organizations issued new /28s than expand these /32s into /29s.
And renumbering will be necessary for this expansion, and the
legacy space folders have used their address space for a long time,
it might be difficult.
Technically, I also think nibble boundary is reasonable, but that
should be considered in other proposal.
Yours Sincerely,
--
Tomohiro Fujisaki