Keyboard Shortcuts
Thread View
j: Next unread messagek: Previous unread messagej a: Jump to all threadsj l: Jump to MailingList overview
Re: [sig-policy] prop-101 Returned to mailing list and Newversion posted
Hi, Randy, If most organizations use provider assigned address space instead of /48 portable assignment, they are not necessarily gonna dump their entry in the routing table, is that correct? So, it's not about placing a barrier to entry in the market, it's placing a barrier to entry in the routing table. Regards Terence ----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> To: "David Woodgate" <dwoodgate5@gmail.com> Cc: "Terence Zhang YH" <zhangyinghao@cnnic.cn>; <sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 11:42 PM Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-101 Returned to mailing list and Newversion posted
so tell me, if ipv6 space is effectively infinite, and they are gonna dump their entry in the routing table anyway, why do we need all this nit-picking detiled policy?
or, in other terms, what is the win in placing a barrier to entry in the market?
randy