Hi, Randy,
If most organizations use provider assigned address space instead of /48 portable assignment,
they are not necessarily gonna dump their entry in the routing table, is that correct?
So, it's not about placing a barrier to entry in the market, it's placing a barrier to entry in the
routing table.
Regards
Terence
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Bush" randy@psg.com
To: "David Woodgate" dwoodgate5@gmail.com
Cc: "Terence Zhang YH" zhangyinghao@cnnic.cn; sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 11:42 PM
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-101 Returned to mailing list and Newversion posted
so tell me, if ipv6 space is effectively infinite, and they are gonna
dump their entry in the routing table anyway, why do we need all this
nit-picking detiled policy?
or, in other terms, what is the win in placing a barrier to entry in the
market?
randy
