j: Next unread message
k: Previous unread message
j a: Jump to all threads
j l: Jump to MailingList overview
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-120, based on a meeting we organised on 31st Jan to discuss these proposals.
Many supporting comment expressed on this proposal. Japanese community support prop-120.
Satoru Tsurumaki JPOPF-ST
2018-01-30 6:34 GMT+09:00 Bertrand Cherrier firstname.lastname@example.org:
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal "prop-120: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan" has been sent to the Policy SIG for review.
Information about earlier versions is available from:
You are encouraged to express your views on the proposal:
- Do you support or oppose the proposal?
- Is there anything in the proposal that is not clear?
- What changes could be made to this proposal to make it more effective?
Please find the text of the proposal below.
Sumon, Bertrand, Ching-Heng APNIC Policy SIG Chairs
prop-120-v002: Final /8 pool exhaustion plan
Proposer: Tomohiro Fujisaki fujisaki at syce dot net
- Problem statement
APNIC makes IPv4 address delegation from two IPv4 pools. These are the 103/8 (Final /8) pool and the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool.
Currently, there are no IPv4 addresses in the non-103/8 IPv4 Recovered pool and APNIC manages a Recovered Pool Waiting List for approved requests. And, based on the Geoff's projection (*1), the 103/8 (Final /8) pool will be exhausted in a few years.
It will be necessary to make a guidance about how to manage the IPv4 delegation after both IPv4 pools exhaustion.
- Objective of policy change
To provide a guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion.
- Situation in other regions
- Proposed policy solution
Guidance for 103/8 pool exhaustion:
The first time an approved request cannot be fulfilled from the 103/8 pool, a waiting list will be created. That waiting list will be managed same as recovered pool waiting list.
APNIC continue to manage two pools, the recovered pool and the 103/8
- Advantages / Disadvantages
- Possible to avoid confusion at 103/8 address pool exhaustion date
- Impact on resource holders
No impact to resource holders.
- IPv4 Address Report
Cordialement, ___________________________________________ Bertrand Cherrier Administration Systèmes - R&D Micro Logic Systems email@example.com https://www.mls.nc Tél : +687 24 99 24 VoIP : 65 24 99 24 SAV : +687 36 67 76 (58F/min)
sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy
sig-policy mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy