I do agree... I think we will change it to 'current'


Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker
v4Now - an eintellego Networks service
IP Address Brokering - Introducing sellers and buyers

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Sanjeev Gupta <sanjeev@dcs1.biz> wrote:

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Gaurab Raj Upadhaya <gaurab@lahai.com> wrote:
"have allocated provider independent address space by
APNIC, AND intend to multi-home in the future"

the 'previous' term is confusing. kind of implies that it doesn't need
to be current allocation (so in theory returned/re-claimed space users
could qualify - though that is not the intention).

It is not just confusing, it is explicitly different.

Aftab, Skeeve, is the "previous" use-case intended? 

Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208   http://sg.linkedin.com/in/ghane

*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
sig-policy mailing list