Keyboard Shortcuts
Thread View
j
: Next unread messagek
: Previous unread messagej a
: Jump to all threadsj l
: Jump to MailingList overview
Re: [sig-policy] prop-104-v001: Clarifying demonstrated needs requirement in IPv4 transfer policy

I oppose this policy. I do not believe it is to APNIC's benefit to adopt ARIN's flawed policy. Owen On Aug 28, 2012, at 19:55 , Dean Pemberton <dean@deanpemberton.com> wrote:
Agreed, thats why I'd like to understand a bit more about what the demonstrated problem is here. Once I can understand that, I'm in a better position to decide what I think about the proposed solution.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
if i understand yesterday's presentation, it is to match (for some unstated reason), arin's justification window.
i find this strange. are we going to adjust to also match some others' windows? are were going to have a global policy on the window? if we need to coordinate all parameters globally, why do we need rirs?
randy
-- Regards,
Dean * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy