Hi Izumi,
As we discussed to make "prop-028-v001: Abolishing IPv6 per address fee for NIRs",
we, NIRs, aleady know pros and cons of this proposal.
KRNIC of NIDA would like to keep it active for more comments and discussion
with APNIC members at the 20th policy SIG.
However, KRNIC of NIDA will follow the majority, so please let us know
others' opinion.
Thanks for your efforts
Billy on behalf of KRNIC of NIDA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Izumi Okutani" izumi@nic.ad.jp
To: sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 4:08 PM
Subject: [sig-nir] [Fwd: [sig-ipv6] Document update - APNIC Fee Schedule]
Dear All,
APNIC has implemented the change in its fee schedule with 90% discount
on the IPv6 per address fee(see the attached annoucement for details).
This is related to "prop-028-v001" proposed at this SIG, and it would be
upto the proposer(NIRs) to drop the proposal or keep it active for
continued discussions.
"prop-028-v001:Abolishing IPv6 per address fee for NIRs"
http://www.apnic.net/docs/policy/discussions/prop-028-v001.txt
What do you wish to do about this proposal? >NIRs
Regards,
Izumi
sig-nir mailing list
sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
