Keyboard Shortcuts
Thread View
j
: Next unread messagek
: Previous unread messagej a
: Jump to all threadsj l
: Jump to MailingList overview

Dear all,
Here is a paper for discussion at the APNIC fee structure session in Perth next week. It introduces a "candidate" fee structure - that of, a possible fee structure that may satisfy our collective requirements.
Please note that this is not a proposal to the meeting, it is an informational presentation for discussion.
I look forward to seeing you all next week.
Paul.
________________________________________________________________________ Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99
Attachments:
- Fees-APNIC21-v1.pdf (application/pdf — 44.6 KB)

Dear Paul,
It's David from TWNIC. May I have two questions regarding the "candidate" fee structure?
As 4.2 session in the attached file Fees-APNIC21-v1.pdf, I'm wondering that what the definition of majority of active members of NIRs is. Will all of IP addresses hold by the active organization be assessed as membership tier?
The second question is why H membership tier is charged 43,520 not 46,080 in sum of NIR fee table on page 6. Could you please clarify this for me? I'm looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks very much!
Best Regards, David Chen TWNIC
Paul Wilson wrote:
Dear all,
Here is a paper for discussion at the APNIC fee structure session in Perth next week. It introduces a "candidate" fee structure - that of, a possible fee structure that may satisfy our collective requirements.
Please note that this is not a proposal to the meeting, it is an informational presentation for discussion.
I look forward to seeing you all next week.
Paul.
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99
sig-nir mailing list sig-nir@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir

Hi David and everyone
I will get back to you as soon as I can.
regards
Paul.
--On Wednesday, 15 March 2006 5:01 PM +0800 David Chen david@twnic.net.tw wrote:
Dear Paul,
It's David from TWNIC. May I have two questions regarding the "candidate" fee structure?
As 4.2 session in the attached file Fees-APNIC21-v1.pdf, I'm wondering that what the definition of majority of active members of NIRs is. Will all of IP addresses hold by the active organization be assessed as membership tier?
The second question is why H membership tier is charged 43,520 not 46,080 in sum of NIR fee table on page 6. Could you please clarify this for me? I'm looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks very much!
Best Regards, David Chen TWNIC
Paul Wilson wrote:
Dear all,
Here is a paper for discussion at the APNIC fee structure session in Perth next week. It introduces a "candidate" fee structure - that of, a possible fee structure that may satisfy our collective requirements.
Please note that this is not a proposal to the meeting, it is an informational presentation for discussion.
I look forward to seeing you all next week.
Paul.
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99
sig-nir mailing list sig-nir@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
________________________________________________________________________ Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99

Thanks Paul,
Best Regards, David
Paul Wilson wrote:
Hi David and everyone
I will get back to you as soon as I can.
regards
Paul.
--On Wednesday, 15 March 2006 5:01 PM +0800 David Chen david@twnic.net.tw wrote:
Dear Paul,
It's David from TWNIC. May I have two questions regarding the "candidate" fee structure?
As 4.2 session in the attached file Fees-APNIC21-v1.pdf, I'm wondering that what the definition of majority of active members of NIRs is. Will all of IP addresses hold by the active organization be assessed as membership tier?
The second question is why H membership tier is charged 43,520 not 46,080 in sum of NIR fee table on page 6. Could you please clarify this for me? I'm looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks very much!
Best Regards, David Chen TWNIC
Paul Wilson wrote:
Dear all,
Here is a paper for discussion at the APNIC fee structure session in Perth next week. It introduces a "candidate" fee structure - that of, a possible fee structure that may satisfy our collective requirements.
Please note that this is not a proposal to the meeting, it is an informational presentation for discussion.
I look forward to seeing you all next week.
Paul.
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99
sig-nir mailing list sig-nir@lists.apnic.net http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-nir
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC dg@apnic.net http://www.apnic.net ph/fx +61 7 3858 3100/99
Activity Summary
- 6408 days inactive
- 6408 days old
- sig-nir@lists.apnic.net
- 2 participants
- 3 comments